Navigation

 

Log in

Username:

Password:

 automatic login
 

Direct Access

 

Recent Posts

Newsfeed

 

Links

 

Fonts +/-

 

 

Who really bought Yukos?

Page 1 of 1

forum index » Energy » Who really bought Yukos?
Energy Post new topic Reply to topic View previous topic View next topic
posted by  : Hannah K. O'Luthon on 12/19/04, 11:38 pm
subject   : Who really bought Yukos?

Yesterday's news of the auction of a major piece of Yukos
brought word of an surprise winner: the Baikal group.
As usual I appeal to Jérôme, our resident expert on energy finance,
to illuminate, if possible, these obscure potentates. Like many others,
I have only the BBC triage: Baikal is either
1) a front for the expected winner of the auction Gazprom
2) a front for the Chinese national oil company
3) the instrument of another oligarch (who has a lower and less anti-Putin political profile than Khodo).
I need hardly state that having an unknown surprise winner to
an auction of this size and strategic importance is grist for the conspiracy theorists' mill, and, more and more, I tend to count myself among that heretical fraternity..


_________________
Hannah K. O'Luthon

Reply with quote Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : rapt on 12/20/04, 7:30 am
subject   : Yukos sale

Yes Hannah, now even NPR reports that the "auction" was rigged, lasting 5- to 8-minutes, interrupted by a phone call, and with only one bidder.

Ho apologies required nor expected for joining the conspiracy club.


Reply with quote Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : catlady on 12/21/04, 12:55 pm
subject   : yukos/conspiracy club

Here's how paranoid I am:

My first thought on hearing the news on NPR was that it was Halliburton or some subsidiary of the Carlyle Group. The fruits of those still-secret energy talks Cheney held right after taking office. At this point, I'd rather see China and Russia forging ties.


_________________
namaste

Reply with quote Send e-mail Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Greco on 12/22/04, 2:51 pm
subject   : 

Hannah,

According to stratfor:

Quote:
BaikalFinansGroup, the Russian company that purchased Yuganskneftegaz at a state auction, reportedly has been purchased by state-owned oil major Rosneft. BaikalFinansGroup's owners have not yet paid for their purchase of Yuganskneftegaz, the oil production arm of Yukos.


Reply with quote ICQ Number Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Guest on 12/22/04, 11:31 pm
subject   : 

Yes, the BBC reported it this morning. I assume that
the lucky few who made up Baikal Finans got their 2%
brokerage fees (or more?). One does have to prepare for retirement after all.


Reply with quote

Back to top


posted by  : Hannah K. O'Luthon on 12/22/04, 11:36 pm
subject   : 

That "guest" was me, Hannah. I'll take the opportunity
to note the clear convergence between Russian and American
"political economy": crooks in high places screw the proles.
The only difference is that the average Russian is well aware
of the process.


_________________
Hannah K. O'Luthon

Reply with quote Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Hannah K. O'Luthon on 01/04/05, 7:31 am
subject   : Who really bought Yukos?

A CIA approved retelling of the sale, replete with details,
may be found at http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=407&issue_id=3181&article_id=2369029,
a site whose sponsor is presided over by James Woolsey (ex DCI) together with a board of directors that can only be characterized as blue-ribbon and blue-blooded. Caveat lector, obviously.


_________________
Hannah K. O'Luthon

Reply with quote Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Jérôme on 01/05/05, 2:52 pm
subject   : soon to come...

Hannah, I am collecting various items of information on the Yukos fracas and hope to post a more comprehensive reply in the not too distant future.

The problems is that the Putinocrats are currently fighting between themselves for the control of both Rosneft and Yugansk, and nobody knows how it will end up.

As always, check articles by Yulia Latynina, she usually writes in the Moscow Times and is always well informed and quite cynical about all Russian politicla and business processes.

See this one: http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2004/12/08/007.html (which requires a subscription, I'll post it in full when I get it from my other computer...


_________________
In the long run, we'll all be dead (Keynes)

Reply with quote Send e-mail Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Hannah K. O'Luthon on 01/07/05, 3:17 am
subject   : 

Thanks Jérôme. I look forward to seeing your take
on this. As you have probably noticed, I prefer this sort of
nitty-gritty detailed discussion of specific topics to the
"systematic restructuring of contemporary society" threads.
The latter surely have there place, and can be thought-provoking,
but seem to me to be rather ethereal. Your posts are
concrete and very illuminating.


_________________
Hannah K. O'Luthon

Reply with quote Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Jérôme on 01/07/05, 9:17 am
subject   : Goodbye Oligarchs, Hello Feudal Capitalism

#20
Moscow Times
December 8, 2004
Goodbye Oligarchs, Hello Feudal Capitalism
By Yulia Latynina

Quote:

After stating repeatedly that it had no intention of bidding for
Yuganskneftegaz, Gazprom has decided to buy Yukos' core production unit
after all.

I'm inclined to take the company at its word that it had no plans to buy
Yugansk. Even the people in President Vladimir Putin's inner circle didn't
initially plan to grab Yukos for themselves.

When thugs shake down a shop owner, they're not trying to get hold of the
shop for themselves. They just want the owner to pay them tribute. If the
owner proves uncooperative, of course, they sometimes have to take over the
shop anyway.

The formation of criminal protection rackets, which thrived in the late
1980s and early 1990s, turned the owners of private property into vassals.
Every piece of property was owned by two people: the businessman who owned
the property, and the criminal who owned the businessman.

Toward the end of Boris Yeltsin's second term, this process came to an end.
The slaveowners were replaced by proprietors -- the oligarchs, who assessed
their wealth not in terms of guns and the number of businessmen under their
thumbs, but by stock portfolios and profit margins.

Now the process is moving in reverse: Private ownership is once more giving
way to feudal ownership.

When an oligarch resists this process, his property is taken away and
handed over to the bureaucrats, as in the case of Yukos. If he does not
resist, he keeps hold of his property but effectively becomes a vassal. He
retains his freedom in the sense that no one throws him in prison. But he
forfeits his freedom just as Russian serfs once did.

Vladimir Potanin and Vladimir Bogdanov aren't in jail, but I doubt that
Mikhail Khodorkovsky would willingly trade places with them.

Nearly all of the influential officials in Putin's inner circle became
chairmen of the board of major state companies: Gazprom, Rosneft,
shipbuilder Sovkomflot and air defense concern Almaz-Antei. They received
these companies as fiefs just as dukes and counts in the Middle Ages were
granted lands in exchange for loyal service to the lord.

This unique system of fief-based capitalism has produced an equally
distinctive system of political clans. Bureaucrats in this system belong to
the person higher up the chain of command to whom they pay tribute. Now
major clashes and shakeups in the Kremlin administration occur because of
commercial, not political, disputes. Maybe, just maybe Dmitry Kozak was
exiled to the Caucasus and removed as board chairman at Sovkomflot not
because he was brighter than the rest of Putin's inner circle, but because
he got caught pocketing the tribute.

The advantage of fief-based capitalism over oligarch ownership of property
immediately became evident. Kozak was stripped of Sovkomflot with the
stroke of a pen, and without resorting to all the tedious procedures that
have been used against Khodorkovsky.

Feudalization does not spell an end to private ownership of property. On
the contrary, the people who control the flow of revenue into state
companies value capitalism very highly where consumption is concerned --
villas in Nice, expensive restaurants, private planes and pretty girls.
Power in its bare, Soviet form -- run-down Volgas and slapdash apartment
buildings for the select few, complete with real Yugoslavian toilets --
doesn't quite cut it.

But they don't have a clue about investment. From the feudal lord's
perspective, investing money in new technology and oil wells that could be
spent on villas and girls makes no sense whatsoever. This sort of
investment only makes your fief more attractive to the next guy, who then
proceeds to buy your position and destroy you.


Yulia Latynina hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.


_________________
In the long run, we'll all be dead (Keynes)

Reply with quote Send e-mail Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


posted by  : Jérôme on 01/07/05, 1:08 pm
subject   : a summary and some nice satire

Russian judge stays Bush inaugural


_________________
In the long run, we'll all be dead (Keynes)

Reply with quote Send e-mail Send private message View user's profile

Back to top


Energy Post new topic Reply to topic View previous topic View next topic
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to forum:    
All times are GMT - 8 Hours